Correlates of retention in HIV care among homosexual and heterosexual men: a comparative study

Olubunmi O. Akinboye; Adeolu J. Alabi; Olufunmilayo I. Fawole

doi:10.51496/jogm.v5.315

Authors

Olubunmi O. Akinboye Nigeria Sustainability and HIV Impact Project (N-SHIP), National HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis & STIs Control Programme, Department of Public Health, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria and Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Adeolu J. Alabi Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Olufunmilayo I. Fawole Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51496/jogm.v5.315

Keywords:

antiretroviral treatment, correlates, heterosexual men, men who have sex with men, retention in HIV care

Abstract

Background: Globally, men who have sex with men (MSM) have a disproportionately high HIV burden compared with heterosexual men. In Nigeria, the HIV seroprevalence rate among MSM has steadily increased, threatening progress towards ending the epidemic.

Objective: This study, therefore, determined and compared the correlates of retention in HIV care among MSM and heterosexual men in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Method: A prospective study of 650 HIV-positive men was conducted. Respondent-driven sampling was used to select 160 HIV-positive MSM, while convenience sampling was used to select 490 HIV-positive heterosexual men from antiretroviral treatment (ART) clinics in Ibadan. All respondents were over 18 years old and ART-naïve. Data were collected using a semi-structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire and a clinical pro forma to track retention over 24 months. Descriptive analysis and a binomial regression model were performed at α = 0.05. Adjusted Risk Ratios (ARRs), defined as the ratio of outcome probabilities between groups after adjustment for confounders, were estimated from the regression model.

Result: The mean ages of heterosexual men and MSM were 43.1 ± 8.67 and 26.4 ± 5.82 years, respectively. Retention at 24 months was significantly higher among heterosexual men (87.6%) than MSM (68.1%) (P < 0.001). Heterosexual men were more likely to be retained if they had two or more wives (ARR): 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09–1.30), lived with a spouse (ARR): 1.23, 95% CI: 1.07–1.43), and had good knowledge of HIV (ARR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.10–1.25). HIV-positive MSM who discussed HIV/AIDS with health workers/peer educators in the last 12 months ((ARR): 4.85, 95% CI: 4.17–5.63) and had a positive attitude to HIV (ARR): 6.14, 95% CI: 4.12–9.15) were more likely to be retained.

Conclusion: Having social relationships, good knowledge of HIV and a positive attitude to HIV influenced retention in care. HIV programmes need periodic outreach education to address HIV knowledge gaps deterring retention among heterosexual men, while integrating peer support and counselling is recommended to reduce internalised stigma and improve attitude among MSM.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1.

UNAIDS. Tackling entrenched inequalities to end epidemics: UNAIDS 95-95-95 target and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). UNAIDS Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2023.

2.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and gay and bisexual men. 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov [cited 1 June 2024].

3.

Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). The urgency of now: AIDS at a crossroads. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2024.

4.

UNAIDS. UNAIDS epidemiological estimates. Available from: https://aidsinfo.unaids.org/ [cited 1 May 2024].

5.

Awofala AA, Ogundele OE. HIV epidemiology in Nigeria. Saudi J Biol Sci 2018; 25(4): 697–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.03.006

6.

Kharsany ABM, Karim QA. HIV infection and AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: current status, challenges, and opportunities. Open AIDS J 2016; 10(1): 34–48. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613601610010034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613601610010034

7.

Arreola S, Santos GM, Solares D, Tohme J, Ayala G. Barriers to and enablers of the HIV services continuum among gay and bisexual men worldwide: findings from the Global Men’s Health and Rights Study. PLoS One 2023; 18(5): e0281578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281578

8.

Goga AE, Dinh TH, Essajee S, Chirinda W, Larsen A, Mogashoa M, et al. What will it take for the global plan priority countries in sub-Saharan Africa to eliminate mother-to-child transmission of HIV? BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19: 783. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4393-5

9.

HIV/STI Integrated Biological and Behavioural Surveillance Survey (IBBSS) 2020. National Agency for the Control of AIDS; 2020. Available from: https://wacphd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/IBBSS-2020-FINAL-REPORT.pdf [cited 23 April 2024].

10.

Daniel C, Ekanem EE, Njab JE, ES O, Robert AA. Retention in care among HIV-infected men who have sex with men attending a community health centre, Yaba Lagos, Nigeria. J AIDS Clin Res 2018; 9(6): 1000770. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000770

11.

UNAIDS. The path that ends AIDS: UNAIDS global AIDS update 2023. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2023. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2019-UNAIDS-data_en.pdf [cited 1 May 2024].

12.

Oyo State Ministry of Health. Strategic health plan 2021–2025. Oyo: Department of Planning Research and Statistics; 2021.

13.

Oyo State Ministry of Health. Oyo State HIV Operational Plan. SASCP, Department of Public Health. Ibadan, Nigeria: Oyo State Ministry of Health; 2024.

14.

Diggle P, Heagerty PJ, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Analysis of longitudinal data. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.

15.

Ibiloye O, Jwanle P, Masquillier C, Van Belle S, Jaachi E, Amoo O, et al. Long-term retention and predictors of attrition for key populations receiving antiretroviral treatment through community-based ART in Benue State, Nigeria: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16(11): e0260557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260557

16.

Heckathorn DD. Comment: snowball versus respondent-driven sampling. Sociol Methodol 2011; 41(1): 355–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01244.x

17.

Schonlau M, Liebau E. Respondent-driven sampling. Stata J 2012; 12(1): 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1201200106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201200106

18.

Integrated Biological and Behavioural Surveillance Survey (IBBSS). Abuja: National Agency for the Control of AIDS; 2014. Available from: https://naca.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Final-Nigeria-IBBSS-2014-report [cited 15 February 2024].

19.

Nardell MF, Adeoti O, Peters C, Kakuhikire B, Govathson-Mandimika C, Long L, et al. Men missing from the HIV care continuum in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. J Int AIDS Soc 2022; 25(1): e25889. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25889

20.

Zhao H, Li X, Wang J, Wang W, Yang C, Li J, et al. A systematic and meta-analysis of heterosexual behaviours and HIV prevalence among Chinese men who have sex with men. AIDS Res Ther 2021; 18(1): 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00392-6

21.

Crowell TA, Fast PE, Bekker L-G, Sanders EJ. Involvement of African men and transgender women who have sex with men in HIV research: progress, but much more must be done. J Int AIDS Soc 2020; 23(1): e25596. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25596

22.

Fiorentino M, Yanwou N, Mazelier RGD, Eubanks A, Roux P, Laurent C, et al. Sexual behaviors and risk with women in MSM in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS 2024; 38(3): 273–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003787

23.

Tobin-West CI, Nwajagu SC, Maduka O, Oranu E, Onyekwere VN, Tamuno I. Exploring the HIV-risk practices of men who have sex with men in Port Harcourt City, Nigeria. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2017; 10(3): 551–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/1755-6783.168721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1755-6783.168721

24.

O’Connell S, O’Rourke A, Sweeney E, Lynam A, Sadlier C, Bergin C. Factors associated with non-retention in HIV care in an era of widespread antiretroviral therapy. Int J STD AIDS 2017; 28(7): 679–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462416663868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462416663868

25.

Afolaranmi T, Hassan Z, Ugwu O, Ofakunrin AD, Bello K, Chingle M, et al. Retention in HIV care and its predictors among HIV-infected men who have sex with men in Plateau State, North Central Nigeria. J Fam Med Prim Care 2021; 10(4): 1596. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1748_20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1748_20

26.

Izuchukwu AN, Ifeanyi EC, Godswill EU, Winnie DU. Risk factors of HIV/AIDS among men who have sex with men in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. J Prev Med Hyg 2023; 64(4): E382–97. https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.4.2931

27.

Srikrishnan AK, Ganesan K, Mehta SH, Tomori C, Vasudevan CK, Celentano DD, et al. Prevalence and correlates of human immunodeficiency virus infection among spouses of married men who have sex with men in India. Int J STD AIDS 2022; 33(10): 896–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624221112815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624221112815

28.

Adebayo A. The criminalisation of consensual same-sex sexual conduct in Nigeria: a critique. SSRN Electr J 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3644604

29.

Eluwa GIE, Adebajo SB, Eluwa T, Ogbanufe O, Ilesanmi O, Nzelu C. Rising HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men in Nigeria: a trend analysis. BMC Public Health 2019; 19(1): 7540. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7540-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7540-4

30.

Drumhiller K, Nanín JE, Gaul Z, Sutton MY. The influence of religion and spirituality on HIV prevention among Black and Latino men who have sex with men in New York City. J Religion Health 2018; 57(5): 1931–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0626-y

31.

Ochonye B, Folayan MO, Fatusi AO, Bello BM, Ajidagba B, Emmanuel G, et al. Sexual practices, sexual behaviour and HIV risk profile of key populations in Nigeria. BMC Public Health 2019; 19(1): 7553. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7553-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7553-z

32.

Bamgboye EA, Badru T, Bamgboye A. Transactional sex between men and its implications on HIV and sexually transmitted infections in Nigeria. J Sex Transm Dis 2017; 2017: 1810346. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1810346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1810346

33.

Kusemererwa S, Akena D, Nakanjako D, Kigozi J, Nanyunja R, Nanfuka M, et al. Strategies for retention of heterosexual men in HIV care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. PLoS One 2021; 16(2): e0246471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246471

34.

Ramadhani HO, Ndembi N, Nowak RG, Ononaku U, Gwamna J, Orazulike I, et al. Individual and network factors associated with HIV care continuum outcomes among Nigerian MSM accessing healthcare services. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018; 79(1): E7–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001756

35.

Maulsby CH, Ratnayake A, Hesson D, Mugavero MJ, Latkin CA. A scoping review of employment and HIV. AIDS Behav 2020; 24(10): 2942–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02845-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02845-x

36.

Ogunbajo A, Mayer KH, Kanki PJ, Tsai AC. Intersectional stigma and HIV continuum outcomes among sexual minority men in sub-Saharan Africa: a conceptual framework. Am J Public Health 2022; 112: S374–6. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306693

37.

Hlongwa M, Jama NA, Mehlomakulu V, Pass D, Basera W, Nicol E. Barriers and facilitating factors to HIV treatment among men in a high-HIV-burdened district in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a qualitative study. Am J Mens Health 2022; 16(5): 15579883221120987. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883221120987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883221120987

38.

Nyato D, Kuringe E, Drake M, Casalini C, Nnko S, Shao A, et al. Participants’ accrual and delivery of HIV prevention interventions among men who have sex with men in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2018; 18(1): 370. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5303-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5303-2

39.

Garofalo R, Adetunji A, Kuhns LM, Omigbodun O, Johnson AK, Kuti K, et al. Evaluation of the ICARE Nigeria pilot intervention using social media and peer navigation to promote HIV testing and linkage to care among high-risk young men in a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5(1): e220148. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0148

40.

Nodin N, Carballo-Diéguez A, Leal IMP. Sexual use of the internet: perceived impact on MSM’s views of self and others. New Media Soc 2014; 16(5): 719–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813489508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813489508

41.

Weatherburn P, Hickson F, Reid DS, Marcus U, Schmidt AJ. European men-who-have-sex-with-men internet survey (EMIS-2017): design and methods. Sex Res Soc Policy 2020; 17(4): 543–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00413-0